Submitted by acohill on Wed, 10/10/2007 - 08:52
It must have been a slow news day yesterday. During a long drive, I heard a news story on the radio at least ten times. It was about a new capability added to GM cars and trucks equipped with Onstar. The vehicle can now be turned off remotely. The news story was all about what a boon this was going to be to law enforcement officials, who could request that the friendly Onstar person turn off the engine in a car being chased by the police.
This sounds benign enough until you start thinking about it a bit. Suppose you get behind on your car payments. Will the bank be able to ask Onstar to disable your vehicle until you pay up? Suppose you owe back taxes; can the IRS request that your vehicle be disabled until you pay? Owe a traffic ticket? Can the local police department, which already knows what vehicle you are driving from the ticket, request that your vehicle be disabled until the fine is paid?
What I have not been able to determine yet is whether or not the vehicle owner can disable this option. If the owner cannot turn this option in the vehicle itself, it is a major privacy issue and a property rights issue. If the government can decide when you are able to drive a car you purchased yourself, you really don't own the car anymore. The government does, and can decide what you do with the vehicle and when you can and cannot drive.
Design Nine provides visionary broadband architecture and engineering services to our clients. We have over seventy years of staff experience with telecom and community broadband-more than any other company in the United States.
We have a full range of broadband and telecom planning, design, and project management services.
Free Fiber to the Home
Save NC Broadband
Blandin on Broadband
Intelligent Community Forum
FCC Broadband Blog
KGP Broadband Stimulus
Ars Technica Tech Policy
Bill St. Arnaud
Stop the Cap
Broadband Policy Watch
Lafayette Pro Fiber