<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.designnine.com/news" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Minnesota</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/24</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Missed opportunity in Minneapolis</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1063</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The city of Minneapolis negotiated a deal with the wireless provider US Internet last year to provide a citywide wireless system.  As part of that deal, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/wirelessminneapolis/commbenefits_wireless.asp&quot;&gt;the city is receiving about a half a million dollars&lt;/a&gt; a year for ten years.  The funds will be used to support community portals for neighborhoods in the city. Planning for those portals is taking place right now. It is a great idea, but the city left a lot of money on the table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the next thirty years, the residents and businesses of Minneapolis (Minneapolis only, not St. Paul) will spend 8.4 billion dollars ($8,403,268,500.00) on telecom services, and so there is plenty of money to build not just wireless but the world&#039;s best, full  integrated fiber and wireless system, to every home and business in the city.  Over thirty years, such a city-managed multi-service open network, designed with end to end automated Layer 3 provisioning, could put nearly 600 million dollars in city coffers ($594,041,030.00).  That&#039;s a bit more than the projected $11 million from wireless.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1063#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/1">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/24">Minnesota</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:58:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1063 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>St. Paul to look for the common good</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/246</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The City Council of St. Paul, Minnesota has approved a study to consider the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/10630551.htm?1c&quot;&gt;feasibility of citywide wireless broadband&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The three month study will look for &quot;the common good&quot; that might be gained from community-managed telecom infrastructure.  This is, as far as I know, the first time the common good has been explicity acknowledged in this kind of study.  It has been implicitly part of many other community telecom projects, but it&#039;s about time we started this particular conversation in more earnest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What has dominated the discussion so far has been the &quot;unfairness&quot; of community telecom projects, all viewed through the lens of monopoly telecom providers.  Using that yardstick, community water systems are &quot;unfair&quot; because someone might want to build their own, private water system.  Public sanitation would be &quot;unfair&quot; because someone might want to get into the sewer business.  Our legislators and government officials need to start thinking more clearly about these issues.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/246#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/1">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/4">Community development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/24">Minnesota</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:57:12 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">246 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
